Mercedes-Benz EQC gets a tough rivalry from Audi’s e-tron. Audi’s e-Tron is the cheaper purchase – at least in entry-level 50 form – with pricing starting at $137,700 before on-road costs, but just $200 separates it from the $137,900 Mercedes-Benz EQC, which is available in a singular 400 grade.
![Premium Electric SUV: Mercedes-Benz EQC Gets a Tough Rivalry by opsule blog](http://opsule.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Untitled-design-2020-06-10T153859.528-1.png)
Audi also has Benz beat on variety, with a more stylish Sportback body style available that adds an $11,000 premium, as well as an up-spec 55 grade that adds more equipment and $9000 to the bottom line.
Both vehicles boast two electric motors – one on each axle – for all-wheel-drive grip, with Audi’s e-tron 50 producing a combined output of 230kW/540Nm, compared with the 300kW/760Nm setup of the EQC 400.
As a result, the Mercedes-Benz EQC is quicker to accelerate from zero to 100km/h, stopping the clock at 5.1 seconds compared with Audi’s 6.8s time.
Both vehicles also sport a braked towing capacity of 1800kg.
Being electric cars though, performance might not be as important as driving range, and it’s in this instance that the Mercedes-Benz EQC comes out on top again.
With its 80kWh battery in tow, the EQC400 will travel up to 353km of range when tested under the new WLTP standard.
The e-tron 50’s smaller 71kWh battery will still manage a commendable 336km of range, though the more expensive 55 version is available with a 95kWh battery and a 436km range in wagon form.
The Mercedes EQC comes out with a better five-year/unlimited-kilometer warranty, versus Audi’s three-year/unlimited-kilometer assurance period, but both have an eight-year/160,000km warranty on the battery.
However, Audi will throw in six years of free scheduled servicing and roadside assist, while Benz is running a current promotion that ends on June 30 with three years of free servicing and a complimentary Wallbox charger and installation.
With the Wallbox installed or through an AC station, the EQC is able to charge from zero to 80 percent capacity in just under 10 hours, but the e-tron 50 will recoup the same 80 percent in just six hours.
The e-tron is also quicker to charge through a DC fast charger, taking less than 30 mins to get to 80 percent compared with the Benz’s 39-minute time.
Buyers of the e-tron also score six years of free charging at Chargefox stations, while EQC buyers get five years.
Standard equipment in the e-tron includes 20-inch wheels, powered tailgate, 12.3-inch digital instrumentation, 10.1-inch multimedia touchscreen with satellite navigation and smartphone support, wireless smartphone charger, heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, and keyless entry and start.
The EQC meanwhile, matches the e-tron in spec (with 10.25-inch sized screens for instrumentation and multimedia), but scores a sunroof, head-up display, premium sound system, selectable ambient lighting package, and AMG interior and exterior touches.
It should also be noted that while the e-tron has adaptive air suspension on both axles, the Mercedes-Benz EQC is fitted with steel springs up front and air suspension in the rear.
Safety-wise, both cars come standard with autonomous emergency braking, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control, and surround-view monitor, as well as a five-star ANCAP safety rating.
![However, Audi will throw in six years of free scheduled servicing and roadside assist, while Benz is running a current promotion that ends on June 30 with three years of free servicing and a complimentary Wallbox charger and installation. With the Wallbox installed or through an AC station, the EQC is able to charge from zero to 80 percent capacity in just under 10 hours, but the e-tron 50 will recoup the same 80 percent in just six hours. The e-tron is also quicker to charge through a DC fast charger, taking less than 30 mins to get to 80 percent compared with the Benz’s 39-minute time.](http://opsule.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Untitled-design-2020-06-10T153828.676-1.png)
However, the Mercedes-Benz EQC did score higher in adult occupant, child occupant and vulnerable road user protection tests with 96, 92 and 75 percent respectively (compared with the e-tron’s 91, 88 and 71 percent results), but the Audi scored higher in the safety assist examination (78% vs the EQC’s 76%).
There isn’t much to separate the e-tron and Mercedes-Benz EQC on paper, with the former’s faster charging times matched by the latter’s slightly better driving range and performance.
It can be argued that the Benz also offers more value for money with much more equipment at a slightly higher price tag, but the six-year free servicing and longer Chargefox subscription available to e-tron buyers also adds to its value equation.
We’ll reserve final judgment until we get behind the wheel of the e-tron on Australian soil, but regardless, we’re excited to see the all-electric premium SUV segment heating up.